Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Thomas v. Barrow County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Thomas
Defendant:
Barrow County Sheriff's Office, Auburn Police Department, Jeffery Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
American General Life Insurance Company v. Thomas
as 1:2014cv01268
Plaintiff:
American General Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Michael T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Howard et al
as 1:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Thomas
Defendant:
Ronzella Howard, Lesleish Dodd, M. Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Conagra Foods, Incorporated
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Thomas
Defendant:
Conagra Foods, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Thomas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00629
Petitioner:
Michael Lashan Thomas
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
as 1:2012cv03274
Defendant:
Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thomas v. United States of America
as 5:2011cv00214
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Thomas
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2010cv02749
Petitioner:
Michael Jerome Thomas
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Marr et al
as 1:2010cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Richie Thomas
Defendant:
Oscar Marion Marr, Crete Carrier Corporation and Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
