Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Gibbs v. Seagraves et al
as 3:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Larry Alonzo Gibbs, Jr.
Defendant:
Tommy Seagraves, Nye, Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drakus v. Seagraves et al
as 3:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
Stephen Drakus
Defendant:
Nassau County Sheriff Tommy Seagraves, Lt. Nye, Capt. Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coates, Jr. v. Seagraves et al
as 3:2013cv00270
Plaintiff:
Joseph Arthur Coates, Jr.
Defendant:
Tommy Seagraves, Nye, Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Seagraves et al
as 3:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Orvel Lloyd
Defendant:
Tommy Seagraves, M. Delacruz, D. Hickox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Nye v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 12-16091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. NYE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Dittman et al v. Superior Communications Solutions, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv02052
Plaintiff:
William Dittman , Jon Flowers , Mark Hammel and others
Defendant:
Superior Communications Solutions, Inc. and John C. Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
American National Insurance Company v. Schneider et al
as 8:2012cv01683
Plaintiff:
American National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dorothy Schneider, Harold Schneider, Terry Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nye v. HSBC Bank USA et al
as 1:2012cv00770
Plaintiff:
James A. Nye
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA and HSDC Bank USA, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nye et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 9:2011cv80279
Plaintiff:
William Nye and Kathleen Nye
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
