Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Fedd v. Odum
as 5:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Levi Arthur Fedd
Defendant:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilpatrick v. Warden Odum
as 1:2022cv04927
Petitioner:
Adrian Kilpatrick
Respondent:
Warden Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Odum et al
as 5:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Solomon R. Bell
Defendant:
Odum, Mr. Cox, Mr. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Ward et al
as 5:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Paul Keith
Defendant:
Commissioner Timothy Ward and Head Warden Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ODUM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 7:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
JAMIE BERNARD ODUM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Odum
as 1:2022cv02637
Plaintiff:
Gregory Williams
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brewner v. Odum
as 1:2022cv02441
Petitioner:
Brian Joseph Brewner
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Warden Brian Coleman, Deputy Warden Roy Odum, Deputy Warden Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Brian Coleman, Roy Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Warden Brian Coleman, Deputy Warden Roy Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
