Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Price v. Shade Street Food, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00429
Defendant:
Shade Street Food, Inc. and Mikka Bramblett Orrick
Plaintiff:
Joel Price
Fong Kai Business Group Co., LTD v. Shade Saver, Inc., d/b/a Optic Wash, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00540
Defendant:
Bryan Myers and Shade Saver, Inc., d/b/a Optic Wash, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fong Kai Business Group Co., LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADE v. JACOBS et al
as 4:2018cv00385
Plaintiff:
MALIK RAHSSAAN WADE
Defendant:
SHADE MCMILLIAN, PAUL SALVO and CHRIS JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shade Systems, Inc. v. Landscape Structures Inc.
as 0:2018cv60734
Plaintiff:
Shade Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Landscape Structures Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Landscape Structures Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Shade Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Veloza v. Canterbury Lamp Shade Studio, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv61273
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Veloza
Defendant:
CANTERBURY LAMP SHADE STUDIO, INC., Nicholas Cavallo, Sr. and Nicholas Cavallo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. AIG Baker Bay Park, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2017cv00561
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant:
AIG Baker Bay Park, L.L.C., AIG Baker Birmingham Properties, L.L.C., AIG Baker Carson Valley, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dodd v. Shades of Green
as 6:2016cv02094
Plaintiff:
Rufus L. Dodd, Jr
Defendant:
Shades of Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shade v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00427
Petitioner:
Antoin Lamar Shade
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Antoin Shade
as 16-13497
Petitioner:
In re: ANTOIN SHADE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
