Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Eato v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2008cv23555
Plaintiff:
Charles Eato
Defendant:
Carlos Alvarez, Daniel Mira, George Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McIntyre v. Ryan
as 1:2008cv22245
Plaintiff:
Harold McIntyre
Defendant:
Timothy Ryan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Louis v. Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv20380
Plaintiff:
Yvel Louis
Defendant:
Department Of Corrections, Timothy Ryan, Gayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Horne et al
as 1:2008cv20141
Plaintiff:
LaVenston Lamont Horne
Defendant:
Timothy Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 1:2008cv20065
Plaintiff:
Victor Ramos and Victor Ramos
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners, Mayor Carlos Alvarez, Timothy Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. Ryan
as 1:2007cv23069
Petitioner:
Antonio Johnson and Shakeeta Redford
Respondent:
Timothy Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson et al v. Ryan
as 3:2007cv01068
Petitioner:
Antonio Johnson and Shakeeta Redford
Respondent:
Timothy Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeLoach v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2007cv22840
Plaintiff:
James L. DeLoach
Defendant:
Carlos Alvarez, George M. Burgess, Timothy Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Ryan et al
as 1:2007cv22804
Plaintiff:
Eugene E. Mack
Defendant:
Timothy Ryan and Daniel Mera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Ryan et al
as 1:2007cv22685
Plaintiff:
James L. Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Ryan and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
