Cases 31 - 40 of 337
Stitchy Fish, LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Stitchy Fish, LLC
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Patel v. The United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02249
Plaintiff:
The Excellent The Excellent Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
National Labor Relations Board v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 23-11340
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
as 23-11076
Petitioner:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Reinier Angulo v. The Shyft Group Usa, Inc., et al
as 23-10927
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REINIER ANGULO
Defendant / Appellee:
THE SHYFT GROUP USA, INC., WORKHORSE CUSTOM CHASSIS, LLC, NAVISTAR, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Tamiko Peele, et al v. 17th Judicial Circuit Court Broward County, et al
as 23-10913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMIKO N. PEELE and ROBERT L. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT BROWARD COUNTY, DOES 1-3, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
