Cases 31 - 40 of 3,478
Cardwell v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Duval F. Cardwell
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Major Mitchell, Major Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
CHARITY NOELLE WOOD
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ohara et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Lanetha Ohara and Lanyla Woods
Defendant:
Noel Johnson, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Mohave Transportation Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Johnson v. Woods
as 1:2024cv01426
Plaintiff:
Sheri C. Johnson
Defendant:
Gloria H. Woods doing business as Glorilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Kendrick v. Warden, Marion County Jail
as 5:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Reavis Levon Kendrick
Defendant:
Billy Woods and Warden, Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Wood, et al
as 8:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Anthony David Wood d/b/a Georgies Garden Cafe, ADW Consulting, LLC d/b/a Bar George, David Anthony Wood doing business as Georgies Garden Cafe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Woods v. Insurance Pipeline Inc.
as 0:2024cv60483
Plaintiff:
Dajah Woods
Defendant:
Insurance Pipeline Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wood Automotive Inc v. Morrow Aviation LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Wood Automotive Inc
Defendant:
Morrow Aviation LLC and Ackerman Aviation Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
