Cases 31 - 40 of 83
In re: Azim Epps
as 16-16640
Petitioner:
In re: AZIM WALEED EPPS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Azim Epps
as 16-14653
Petitioner:
In re: AZIM WALEED EPPS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Epps v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00159
Petitioner:
Azim Waleed Epps
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dobruck, Jr. v. Dawsy et al
as 8:2016cv01809
Plaintiff:
Walter Dobruck, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Dawsy, Gary S. Borders, Jerry Demings and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721
Dobruck et al v. Orange County Sheriff et al
as 6:2016cv01035
Plaintiff:
Angelica Dobruck , Faith Bazemore Dobruck , Jane Bazemore and others
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriff, Citrus County Sheriff, Lake County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721
Florida Southeast Connection, LLC v. 4.542 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Polk County, Florida et al
as 8:2016cv00675
Plaintiff:
Florida Southeast Connection, LLC
Defendant:
4.542 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Polk County, Florida, Oakwood Land Company LLP, City of Lake Wales, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Heartland Communities, LLC et al v. Baxter Construction Company, LLC
as 2:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Heartland Communities, LLC and One HC - Lake Wales, LLC
Defendant:
Baxter Construction Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rayburn v. Moose International, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Saysha Rayburn and Sienna Wilkinson
Defendant:
Moose International, Inc. and Lake Wales Lodge # 2391, Loyal Order of Moose, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waling Choizilme v. U.S. Attorney General
as 15-13845
Petitioner:
WALING CHOIZILME
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
