Cases 41 - 50 of 1,035
Johnson v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
Natonia Sharpe Johnson and Natonia Sharpe-Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Daryl Sharp v. Archbishop of New York, et al
as 23-12073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCHBISHOP OF NEW YORK, JOSE GOMEZ VELASCO and BLAISE CUPICH
Sharp v. Vance and Huffman LLC
as 4:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sharp
Defendant:
Vance and Huffman LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Mark Sharp
as 23-12357
Petitioner:
In re: MARK EVERETT SHARP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SHARPE v. FCA US LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHARPE
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, PANHANDLE AUTOMOTIVE INC, BAY CARS SOUTH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19190
Plaintiff:
JACOB SHARP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CANSLER et al v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
AMY CANSLER, ANDREW CANSLER, CHRISTOPHER LANDERS and others
Defendant:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17331
Plaintiff:
JACOB RYAN SHARP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17249
Plaintiff:
DANNY SHARP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17009
Plaintiff:
KELSO SHARP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
