Cases 41 - 50 of 206
SYLVAIN v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
as 4:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
FARA SYLVAIN
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
BOECKER v. AMAZON.COM INC
as 5:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY BOECKER
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
NeuroMd Medical Technologies LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2023cv21760
Plaintiff:
NeuroMd Medical Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Torres v. Amazon.Com Services LLC
as 8:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Dayanara J. Torres
Defendant:
Amazon.Com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Clark v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
George Lee Clark
Defendant:
Dr. Eben Alexander, III, Simon and Shuster, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
TAUNTON v. DOE et al
as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TAUNTON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, GPA TRUCKING EXPRESS INC, AMAZON.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
NeuroMd Medical Technologies LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2023cv21757
Plaintiff:
NeuroMd Medical Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
NeuroMd Medical Technologies, LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.
as 1:2023cv21754
Plaintiff:
NeuroMd Medical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
