Cases 41 - 50 of 211
Giscombe v. Access Florida et al
as 6:2022cv01457
Plaintiff:
M. Antoinette Giscombe
Defendant:
Access Florida, DCF Headquarters, Access Florida Kissimmee Location and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PLEASANT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12672
Plaintiff:
MERCEDES ANTOINETTE PLEASANT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc. v. Exna
as 6:2022mc00024
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
Defendant:
Antoinette Exna
Giscombe v. U-Haul Storage et al
as 6:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
M. Antoinette Giscombe
Defendant:
U-Haul Storage, Uhaul "Main Office" and Uhaul "Where Property is Stored"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hope et al v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2022cv21922
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Hope and Buddy Hope
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Hope et al v. United States Of America
as 1:2022cv21924
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Hope and Buddy Hope
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Hope et al v. United States Of America
as 1:2022cv21923
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Hope and Buddy Hope
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc et al v. Touvi
as 0:2022mc61158
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc. as successor in interest to Matthew Orso, in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as Zeekrewards.com
Defendant:
Antoinette Kramps Touvi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Taylor v. Brooks et al
as 5:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Richelle Antoinette Taylor
Defendant:
Chad Brooks, Ryan Byrd, Abraham Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
