Cases 41 - 50 of 99
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00140
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Dushane Spaulding v. Field Office Director, Miami, et al
as 20-12420
Petitioner:
DUSHANE SPAULDING
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, William Barr, FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, MIAMI FIELD OFFICE, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv22552
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00870
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00785
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Soul Quest Church of Mother Earth, Inc. et al v. Attorney General, United States of America et al
as 6:2020cv00701
Defendant:
acting administrator Uttam Dhillon, Attorney General William Barr, U. S. Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Soul Quest Church of Mother Earth, Inc. and Christopher Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scroos LLC et al v. Barr et al
as 6:2020cv00689
Plaintiff:
Scroos LLC, Brigette Katz, Yael katz and others
Defendant:
Attorney General William Barr, Ken Cuccinelli, Kathy Baran and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv21550
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
