Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Eato v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2009cv20008
Plaintiff:
Charles Eato
Defendant:
Carlos Alvarez, Daniel Mera, George M. Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eato v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2008cv23555
Plaintiff:
Charles Eato
Defendant:
Carlos Alvarez, Daniel Mira, George Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pazos et al v. RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc.
as 1:2008cv20588
Plaintiff:
Felipe Pazos, Felipe Pazos, Felipe Pazos and others
Defendant:
RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramos v. Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 1:2008cv20065
Plaintiff:
Victor Ramos and Victor Ramos
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners, Mayor Carlos Alvarez, Timothy Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2007cv23003
Plaintiff:
Allan Taylor
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Carlos Alvarez, Louis Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell et al v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2007cv22997
Plaintiff:
Brenna Bell, Brenna Bell, Brenna Bell and others
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Carlos Alvarez, Louis Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeLoach v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2007cv22840
Plaintiff:
James L. DeLoach
Defendant:
Carlos Alvarez, George M. Burgess, Timothy Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Thodde v. City of Aventura et al
as 1:2007cv22233
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Thodde and Jessie J. Thodde
Defendant:
City of Aventura, Susan Gottlieb, Thomas E. Ribel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Alvarez v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv10014
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alvarez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
