Cases 41 - 50 of 179
Mitchell v. Corizon Medical et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00677
Plaintiff:
Estevernico A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Corizon Medical, Darryl Hamilton, Jackson Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2017cv00416
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, LEON COUNTY FLORIDA, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyal v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv00933
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Dyal
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones, Corizon Medical Proprietor, Choung Le, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott v. Corizon Medical Services Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00465
Plaintiff:
James Abbott
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc., Dr. Saddiq, Jeff Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Carter et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00415
Plaintiff:
Leon Lamar McGhee
Defendant:
Derrick Carter, Corizon Medical Service , Richard Hallworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ki Kim v. Butch Conway, et al
as 17-12159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KI KIM
Defendant - Appellee:
BUTCH CONWAY, GWINNETT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, CORIZON MEDICAL and others
James Palmer v. Corizon Medical, et al
as 17-11369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON MEDICAL and MARGIE GOMEZ-CAMPORRE, M.D.
Taylor v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 3:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Taylor
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, William Neils and Olu Ogunsanwo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Specks et al
as 2:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Carlos Brooks
Defendant:
Cedric Specks, Corizon Medical Services, Officer Hill and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Carlos Brooks
Defendant:
Roeisha Butler, Officer Rivers, Sgt. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
