Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Rostcheck v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 8:2016cv02935
Plaintiff:
Barry Rostcheck
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Vulpis v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 0:2016cv61200
Plaintiff:
Merissa Vulpis
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Suarez v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 6:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
Luis Suarez
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Caudle v. 2nd Chance Auto Sales et al
as 2:2015cv00522
Plaintiff:
Monica Caudle
Defendant:
2nd Chance Auto Sales, Tony Richards, Credit Acceptance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Anderson v. American Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03032
Plaintiff:
George Anderson
Defendant:
American Credit Acceptance Corporation and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Pinkard v. R&S Auto Sales LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Randolf Pinkard
Defendant:
R&S Auto Sales LLC , Roderick Callins and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Dale
as 1:2011cv01739
Plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory T. Dale
Movant:
Dealer Funding, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Gregory T. Dale
Counter_defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dale v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 1:2011cv01122
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Dale
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
