Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 663
USA v. Gregory Chandler, Jr.
as 23-12836
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: GREGORY CHANDLER, JR.
CHANDLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22418
Plaintiff: ANDREW DAVID CHANDLER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv21279
Plaintiff: CHANDLER SMITH
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drake v. Zimmerman et al
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Drake
Defendant: Chief Andy Zimmerman, Officer Chandler, Officer James Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19323
Plaintiff: JONATHAN CHANDLER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CREAMER v. FORD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff: SEAN LEE CREAMER
Defendant: TOMMY FORD, JEFFERY BENNETT, DAVID HIGGINS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv21891
Plaintiff: Ronald Chandler
Respondent: Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
STOVER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16164
Plaintiff: CHANDLER STOVER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Zachary Chandler
as 23-12106
Petitioner: In re: ZACHARY CHANDLER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CHANDLER-BRADSHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15947
Plaintiff: DANIEL CHANDLER-BRADSHAW
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?