Cases 41 - 50 of 134
Grimes v. Noe et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Grimes
Defendant:
Guy Noe, Mitchell, N Estelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Currington v. Warden Crabtree et al
as 5:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
DeAndre D Currington
Defendant:
Warden Crabtree, Ms. Embacke and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lively v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carroll Lively
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2022cv01386
Petitioner:
William Dale Watson
Respondent:
Chadwick Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRABTREE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21402
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CARL CRABTREE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stovall v. Gwathney et al
as 5:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Stovall
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Darryl Littleton, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRABTREE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16818
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CRABTREE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Poores v. Hamm et al
as 5:2022cv01034
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lee Poores
Defendant:
John Hamm, Crabtree, Schaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRABTREE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15614
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CRABTREE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRABTREE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12772
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY BRAYLYNN CRABTREE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
