Cases 41 - 50 of 140
Hensonz v. Whitfield County Superior Court District Attorney Office
as 4:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
Daryl Alfonso Hensonz
Defendant:
Whitfield County Superior Court District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Licari v. Hughes et al
as 1:2021cv04034
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Licari
Defendant:
Rena Hughes, Mary Kay Holthus, Elizabeth Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moragne v. Newton District Attorney Office et al
as 1:2021cv04017
Plaintiff:
Dorian Moragne and Dorian L. Moragne
Defendant:
Newton District Attorney Office, Newton County Jail, Ezell Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuten v. Gause et al
as 4:2021cv00250
Plaintiff:
Nash N. Tuten
Defendant:
Justin Gause, Capt. Scanz, Ofc Skaff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv03396
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Christopher Lee Bishop, Sylvia Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoard v. Cobb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv03337
Plaintiff:
Robert Hoard, IV
Defendant:
Cobb County, Georgia, Cobb County Police Dept., Cobb District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sims v. Kemp et al
as 4:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Bryan K. Sims
Defendant:
Gov. Brian Kemp, Department of Corrections, Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. Cobb County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2021cv02533
Plaintiff:
Torrey Coleman
Defendant:
Deputy Marco Cabrera, Ralph Lomuscio, Judge Gregory A Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
