Cases 41 - 50 of 285
Richards v. Harris et al
as 8:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Hubert Richards
Defendant:
Shevaun Harris, Curtis J. Neal, Jodi A. Zakaria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
GENTRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02644
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN GENTRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS et al v. Atlas Air, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv23519
Plaintiff:
Patrick Akerlund, Michael Alzati, Eric Anderson and others
Defendant:
JASON FRISBIE, ROBERT GIUDICE, ANDREAS KOUSTAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20242
Plaintiff:
GENTRY WAYNE WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tidwell v. Gentry
as 8:2022cv02324
Plaintiff:
Andrew Connor Tidwell
Defendant:
Kendall Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GENTRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16652
Plaintiff:
DARRYL GENTRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davey v. Osceola County, Florida et al
as 6:2022cv01452
Plaintiff:
Catherine E. Davey
Defendant:
Osceola County, Florida, Officer Be'Anka Wilson, Officer David Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monk v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
Barbara C Monk
Defendant:
United States, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Cheron Y Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11534
Plaintiff:
GENTRY LABRON DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
