Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Griffin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv01233
Petitioner:
Alvin Griffin
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General State of Florida and John Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Palmer et al
as 3:2015cv00824
Plaintiff:
Enoch Donnell Hall
Defendant:
John Palmer, Jeffery McClellan, Gina Gay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUHAMMAD v. JONES et al
as 4:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES , ALEX TAYLOR , MARVIN DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horne v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00634
Plaintiff:
Mickey Horne
Defendant:
Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, Diane Andrews, Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAGWOOD v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00613
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L MAGWOOD
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , JOHN PALMER , JEFFREY MCCLELLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v CREWS, et al
as 4:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
CHADWICK DEWELLYN BANKS
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , PAM BONDI , RICK SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Palmer et al
as 3:2014cv01148
Plaintiff:
Fred Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
John Palmer and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdool v. Palmer et al
as 3:2014cv01147
Plaintiff:
Dane Patrick Abdool
Defendant:
John Palmer and Michael D. Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nixon v. Palmer et al
as 3:2014cv01152
Plaintiff:
Joe Elton Nixon
Defendant:
John Palmer and Michael D. Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Palmer et al
as 3:2014cv01149
Plaintiff:
Etheria V. Jackson
Defendant:
John Palmer and Michael D. Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
