Cases 41 - 50 of 202
EASTERLY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14124
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE EASTERLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANGLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13679
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE LANGLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11352
Plaintiff:
DANE MICHAEL LEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Youngblood v. United States
as 2:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Youngblood
Defendant:
Artegus L. Felder and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
BOCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06999
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE BOCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
POLLY v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06270
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE POLLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ERICKSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05543
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE ERICKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee v. Weeks (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Dillon Lee and Dillon Michael Lee
Defendant:
Sgt. Weeks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01183
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Jefferson
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
FRODESEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03753
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE FRODESEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
