Cases 41 - 50 of 161
Whitt v. Mills et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Cpt. Danziey and Warden Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Mills et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00852
Defendant:
Lt. Edwards, Captain Danzey, Sgt. Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Mills et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00714
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Cpt. Danziey and Warden Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Cargail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00647
Defendant:
Cpt. Cargail, Cpt. Danziey and Warden Mills
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Mills et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00648
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Cpt. Danziey, Lt. Ewards, Warden Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Adams et al
as 1:2018mc00004
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arthur Lamar Adams and Madison Timber Properties, LLC
Receiver:
Alysson L. Mills
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Adams et al
as 2:2018mc03825
Undetermined:
Alysson L. Mills
Defendant:
Madison Timber Properties, LLC and Arthur Lamar Adams
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Mills v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00584
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Mills
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alverson v. Mills et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Lorenzo Mills, Mary Cook, Mr. Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grange Mutual Casualty Company v. Indian Summer Carpet Mills Inc et al
as 4:2017cv01263
Plaintiff:
Grange Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
Indian Summer Carpet Mills Inc, Water Works and Sewer Board of the City of Gadsden, The and Water Works and Sewer Board of The Town of Centre, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
