Cases 41 - 50 of 51
CORDINGLY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03134
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COX, CLIFFORD RILEY, PETER CAROTHERS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DIXON et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03069
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES, JORDAN BLACKBURN, RICARDO DIXON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matthew JohnsonIn re: Matthew Johnson
as 19-12485
Not Yet Classified:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
In re: MATTHEW JOHNSON
Budget Rent A Car System, Inc. et al v. Johnson et al
as 0:2017cv61243
Plaintiff:
Budget Rent A Car System, Inc. and ACE American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Matthew Johnson, Clint Basadgo and Armand Ramnauth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Matthew Johnson v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 15-14041
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Matthew Johnson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 15-13266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Johnson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv02988
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eimers v. City of Key West et al
as 4:2014cv10028
Plaintiff:
Treavor Eimers
Defendant:
City of Key West , Gabriel Humberto Garrido , Gustavo Adolfo Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. TUCKER
as 4:2012cv00457
Petitioner:
MATTHEW JOHNSON
Respondent:
KENNETH TUCKER and PAMELA BONDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weir et al v. Stagg et al
as 1:2009cv21745
Plaintiff:
Steaphan Weir, Chad Needy, Michael D'Ambrose and others
Defendant:
Scott A Stagg, Stagg Capital Group, LLC, Distressed High Yield Trading Opportunities Fund, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
