Cases 41 - 50 of 102
McRae v. Lockett et al
as 5:2017cv00299
Plaintiff:
Andre McRae
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, FNU Shippee, FNU Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Holmes v. Strain, et al
as 16-16242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES G. HOLMES
Defendant - Appellee:
STRAIN, Law librarian, BOOKER, Assistant Warden, WARDEN and others
Elijah Jackson, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 16-11030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH JACKSON, JR., a.k.a. Elijah Jackson Jr
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES UPCHURCH, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF INSTITUTIONS, WARDEN and others
Muhammad v. Sapp et al
as 2:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
Akeem Muhammad
Defendant:
George Sapp, James Upchurch and James McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv60286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Trotter v. Bechtold et al
as 5:2014cv00517
Plaintiff:
Andrew Maurice Trotter
Defendant:
William Bechtold, Florentino J. Morlote, FNU Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin Schmoldt, III v. Walter Jefferis, et al
as 14-13557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN BURTON SCHMOLDT, III
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER JEFFERIS, Deputy, MARK HALLFORD, Deputy, ALMA UPCHURCH, Deputy and others
Stinson v. Upchurch et al
as 1:2014cv01471
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Stinson
Defendant:
Mitchell Upchurch and Danny Turner
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , JAMES R UPCHURCH , ALEX TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cooke et al
as 5:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Harvey R. Johnson
Defendant:
Jason Cooke, Kenny Atkinson, Bryan Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
