Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00069
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00190
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Graham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01034
Plaintiff: James Bryson Graham
Defendant: W. Davis Malone, III , William C. Carn , Joe Godwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02832
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DAVIS et al v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00190
Plaintiff: MARY LYNN DAVIS and MICHAEL W DAVIS
Defendant: MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and Mentor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Renken et al
as 9:2012cv80805
Plaintiff: William Davis and W. Davis & Associates, Inc.
Defendant: Frederick H. Renken and Sea Fox Boat Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samara Consultant Group, et al v. Roy Davi
as 12-12279
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROY W. DAVIS
Plaintiff - Appellee: SAMARA CONSULTANT GROUP, A. M. SAMARA and TAZEWELL TAYLOR SHEPARD, as Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Strickland & Davis International, Inc.
In re: Roy Davi
as 12-12137
Petitioner: In re: ROY W. DAVIS
: SERVICE
Samara Consultant Group, et al v. Roy Davis, et al
as 12-10775
Plaintiff - Appellee: SAMARA CONSULTANT GROUP, a corporation, A. M. SAMARA and TAZEWELL T. SHEPARD, as Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Strickland & Davis International, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: ROY W. DAVIS, individually, CINDY DENISE TAYLOR, DAVID WAYNE DAVIS and others
Davis v. Barton
as 3:2011mc00055
Plaintiff: Kenneth W. Davis
Defendant: Joel Barton

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?