Cases 41 - 50 of 363
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hodge v. Wilkes
as 1:2022cv03909
Petitioner:
Willie C. Hodge
Respondent:
Warden Wilkes and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eddie James King v. Wade W. Herring, III, et al
as 22-12774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant / Appellee:
WADE WILKES HERRING, III and ALISON L. CURRIE
Gordon v. Wilkes
as 1:2022cv03102
Petitioner:
Merease Gordon
Respondent:
Warden Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ridley v. Wilks
as 1:2022cv02982
Petitioner:
Edward Tyrone Ridley
Respondent:
WARDEN WILKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
RIDLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EPA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. KILBY et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
TAYMAR FREDERICK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN RICHARD KILBY, WARDEN OF SECURITY MCCLUNG, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Galdamez et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Detective Jose Galdamez, Attorney Dante Hudson, District Attorney Stephen D. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. JACKSON et al
as 5:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
TARRA JACKSON, WARDEN WILKES and TIMOTHY WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
