Cases 51 - 60 of 151
BELLAS v. MURRAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LYNN BELLAS
Defendant:
MURRAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, ANDY DILLS, BOATWRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNEED v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDY SNEED
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, EDWARD PHILBIN and SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. ALABAMA, STATE OF et al
as 4:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
ANDY NOWELL
Defendant:
ALABAMA, STATE OF, COLUMBUS GEORGIA, JEREMY ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOWELL v. ALABAMA, STATE OF
as 4:2017cv00237
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Respondent:
ALABAMA, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NOWELL v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 4:2017cv00230
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Respondent:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA, COLUMBUS GEORGIA and ALABAMA, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eady v. Dodge County Court et al
as 3:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Andy Eady
Defendant:
Dodge County Court, Tammatha Wiggins, District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowell v. Court System, Russell County, Alabama
as 1:2017cv04076
Plaintiff:
Andy Nowell
Defendant:
Court System, Russell County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eady v. Dodge County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andy Eady
Defendant:
Dodge County Jail and Inmate Medical Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoples et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv02890
Plaintiff:
Debra Peoples , Scott Spires , Robert Bohler and others
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd, Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
