Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Farrar v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Wayne Farrar
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson et al v. Flagship Financial Group, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv03337
Plaintiff:
Michael Watson and Shannon Watson
Defendant:
Flagship Financial Group, LLC and Sally A. Farrar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Farrar v. Webster
as 4:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Carl Farrar
Defendant:
Franklin Webster and Franklin Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Farrar v. Handel
as 1:2009cv00455
Plaintiff:
John Farrar and John Farrar
Defendant:
Karen C. Handel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrar v. Holland & Knight, LLP
as 1:2009cv20245
Plaintiff:
R. Thomas Farrar
Defendant:
Holland & Knight, LLP, Holland & Knight, LLP and Holland & Knight, LLP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CANAL INDEMNITY COMPANY v. COASTWIDE DISASTER RELIEF AND RECOVERY, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00412
Plaintiff:
CANAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
COASTWIDE DISASTER RELIEF AND RECOVERY LLC, DANIEL ADAMS, JOE A ALONSO and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Farrar v. LaStrappe et al
as 1:2008mi00208
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Farrar
Defendant:
Chandra LaStrappe and Corrita Meeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Green v. Jefferson County Commission et al
as 2:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
Steven Green, Steven Green, Mark Persall and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County Commission and General Retirement System For Employees of Jefferson County, Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Farrar v. The Georgia State Board of Examiners of Psychologists
as 1:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
John Farrar and John Farrar
Defendant:
The Georgia State Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
