Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Goodway v. Gainey et al
as 5:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Goodway
Defendant:
Emery Gainey, Mike Rolls, FNU Mosher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walde v. Salvation Army et al
as 5:2016cv00733
Plaintiff:
Paul Donovan Walde
Defendant:
Salvation Army, Marion County Sheriff's Office and Emery Gainey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walde v. Marion County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2016cv00713
Plaintiff:
Paul Donovan Walde
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Office, Emery Gainey, Roselynn Collazo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon Gresham v. Marion County Jail, et al
as 16-17227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DILLON JAMES GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
MARION COUNTY JAIL, OCALA COMMUNITY CARE, INC., EMERY GAINEY, Sheriff, Marion County and others
Waldron v. Gainey et al
as 5:2016cv00658
Plaintiff:
Jolene Waldron
Defendant:
Emery A. Gainey and Gregory Spicher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham v. Marion County Jail et al
as 5:2016cv00648
Plaintiff:
Dillon James Gresham
Defendant:
Marion County Jail, Ocala Community Care, Inc., Emery Gainey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deedrick v. Marion County Jail et al
as 5:2016cv00635
Plaintiff:
Harold Mitchell Deedrick
Defendant:
Marion County Jail, Marion County Jail Medical, Marion County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walde v. Marion County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2016cv00632
Plaintiff:
Paul Walde
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Office, Emery Gainey and Marion County Sheriff's Office Mail Room
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAINEY v. LOPEZ-RIVERA
as 3:2016cv00486
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GAINEY
Defendant:
LUIS LOPEZ-RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
