Cases 51 - 60 of 85
Gardiner v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv23146
Petitioner:
Elon Gardiner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. Gillespie
as 0:2016cv61235
Plaintiff:
Andramedia C. Robinson
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Gillespie, Vicky Plant, Nicolas Lopane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Elon Gardiner
as 16-13086
Petitioner:
In re: ELON GARDINER
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01699
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc. and Paul A. Gardiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gardiner v. United States Of America
as 0:2016cv60988
Plaintiff:
Otis Leithland Gardiner
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown et al v. Gardiner, Koch, Weisberg & Wrona et al
as 9:2016cv80290
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brown and Wendy Brown
Defendant:
Gardiner, Koch, Weisberg & Wrona , James Koch and Katherine Lynn Raynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gardiner v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv21204
Plaintiff:
Elon Gardiner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Eddie Chambers v. Birmingham, Al, et al
as 14-11127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BIRMINGHAM, AL, T. GARDINER and RAYNARD E. ESCOTT
:
SERVICE
Castro v. City of Miami et al
as 1:2014cv20504
Plaintiff:
Jorge Castro , Nestor Garcia , Francisco Casanovas and others
Defendant:
City of Miami , City of Miami Firefighters and Police Officers Retirement Trust & Plan , Board of Trustees of the City of Miami Firefighters and Police Officers Retirement Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
