Cases 51 - 60 of 112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Epic Lounge & Bistro Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02801
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Epic Lounge & Bistro Inc. and Michael L. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
Wilson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv01365
Petitioner:
Tony L. Wilson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson, et al. v. Transcend Services, Inc.
as 8:2015cv01525
Plaintiff:
Renee Demmery, Darcy Wingler and Sherry L. Wilson
Not Classified By Court:
Mark A. Hanley
Defendant:
Transcend Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wilson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv00624
Petitioner:
Tony L. Wilson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Palmer et al
as 3:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Anthony Markiece Jackson
Defendant:
John Palmer, Julie Jones, Eric Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Wilson v. Secretary, Department of Corre
as 15-10516
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH L. WILSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv62360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
