Cases 51 - 60 of 93
MCNEILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67551
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCNEILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCNEILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67290
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MCNEILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCNEILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv63146
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BURGESS GRIFFIN MCNEILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCNEILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv59260
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRED LOUIS MCNEILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCNEILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv51048
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCNEILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCNEILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26742
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MCNEILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCNEILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv17867
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCNEILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copley v. Dillenger
as 8:2019cv03082
Defendant:
Jane McNeill, Bob Dillenger, Lori Mahin and others
Plaintiff:
Bret Ryan Copley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. McNeill
as 6:2019cv00781
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nelson
Defendant:
Darcelle McNeill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Robinson v. City of Sylacauga et al
as 1:2018cv01870
Defendant:
Kelley B Johnson, City of Sylacauga, Officer Jason McNeill and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Keith Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
