Cases 51 - 60 of 106
Macleod v. Governor Rick Scott et al
as 3:2015cv00932
Plaintiff:
Robert Craig Macleod
Defendant:
Governor Rick Scott and Attorney General Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bugoni v. Castor et al
as 8:2015cv01716
Plaintiff:
Piero A. Bugoni
Defendant:
Jane Castor, Eric Ward, FNU Carithers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Florida Attorney General, Pam Bondi
as 3:2015cv00839
Petitioner:
Tuvulsiae L. Chambers
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General, Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McMillin v. Aronberg et al
as 9:2015cv80689
Plaintiff:
Barbara McMillin
Defendant:
David Aronberg, Pam Bondi, Edward L Artau and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Reddick v. Scott et al
as 6:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Bryon L. Reddick
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Julie L. Jones, Michael Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrell v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2015cv00041
Defendant:
State of Florida, Lee Co. Justice Center, Lee Co. Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lorne Farrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davies v. Scott et al
as 6:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jeff Davies
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Pam Bondi, Rick Swearingen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Gerald Bailey, Commissioner et al
as 3:2014cv01497
Plaintiff:
George M. Richardson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Gerald Bailey, Commissioner, Florida Attorney General, Pam Bondi, St. Johns County Sheriff, Neil Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. CANNON et al
as 5:2014cv00333
Respondent:
TIMOTHY H CANNON and PAM BONDI
Petitioner:
ROBERT J BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHADWICK v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00609
Petitioner:
JAMES CHADWICK
Respondent:
MICHAEL D CREWS and PAM BONDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
