Cases 51 - 60 of 291
Humphrey v. Desmond et al
as 1:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Montay Desmond Humphrey
Defendant:
Conor P. Desmond, U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Suh v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 6:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Andrew Suh
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 6:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez Jimenez
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batoon v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 6:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Edmundo N. Batoon
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerow v. Newsom et al
as 8:2022cv02976
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerow
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, California State Senate, Toni Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 23-10120
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
