Cases 61 - 70 of 476
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Owen Denson, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 22-12856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OWEN D. DENSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LORI NORWOOD, Asst. Warden of Programs and others
CONNER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14935
Plaintiff:
CORY WAYNE CONNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CONNER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11212
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THOMAS CONNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHILLIPS-BRANDON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv10965
Plaintiff:
CONNER PHILLIPS-BRANDON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JACKSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, JOHNNY FRAMBO, ROBERT CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09415
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN LEE CONNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CONNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08466
Plaintiff:
LORAY CONNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STARKS v. WHITE et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
JOSEPH DONNELL STARKS
Respondent:
D PARKS WHITE, HARVEY WASSERMAN, EARNEST MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White et al v. Aegis Security Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00572
Plaintiff:
Julia White and Michael Conner
Defendant:
Aegis Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
