Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Shelton v. Rohrs et al
as 5:2009cv00344
Plaintiff: Norman Nabir Shelton
Defendant: R. Rohrs, LT. McCullough, LT. Nobles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Negron et al
as 5:2009cv00308
Plaintiff: George A. Jones, Jr.
Defendant: I.L. Negron, MD, H. Georgie, MD, Utilization Review Committee (URC) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson v. Drew We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00233
Petitioner: Melvin Anderson
Respondent: D. Drew
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Pinson et al v. Kleckner et al
as 5:2009cv00063
Plaintiff: Jeremy Pinson and Gabriel Hernandez-Cadena
Defendant: M. Kleckner, R. McCollough, D. Drew and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00284
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Clem v. Drew (INMATE3)
as 2:2008cv00273
Plaintiff: Danny R. Clem
Defendant: D. Drew
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Lappin et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2007cv01117
Plaintiff: Roy Williams
Defendant: Harley Lappin and D. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fortson v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLC et al (INMATE2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00576
Plaintiff: Carey A. Fortson, Sr.
Defendant: Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, Con Agra Foods, LLC, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dumonde v. Drew et al (INMATE2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00188
Plaintiff: Daniel Lafitte Dumonde
Defendant: D. Drew, Paul D. Clement and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?