Cases 61 - 70 of 19,333
STROUD v. PARRELL et al
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY STROUD
Defendant:
STEPHEN PARRELL, JOHN DOES, CAPTAIN TRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 0:2024cv60900
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 0:2024cv60901
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 0:2024cv60902
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 0:2024cv60903
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv22023
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
C Jones, D. Luke, FNU Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bennett v. Buntain et al
as 1:2024cv02321
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bennett
Defendant:
Jeffrey Buntain, BCL Roadrunner, LLC, Great West Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.99.173.210
as 1:2024cv02310
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 24.99.173.210
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 76.145.254.52
as 1:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 76.145.254.52
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
