Cases 61 - 70 of 105
Sanders et al v. Rhoades et al
as 6:2018cv00394
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey James Sanders, K. Smith, J. Christian Haile and others
Defendant:
C. Rhoades, J. Kromholz, K.H.P. Bryk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards et al v. Deloitte & Touche LLP
as 1:2016cv21221
Defendant:
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Plaintiff:
Anthony R Edwards , Gator Capital Management, LLC , Perini Capital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Humphries v. Bluestem Brands, Inc.
as 8:2016cv00437
Plaintiff:
Alwilda Humphries
Defendant:
Bluestem Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Humphries et al v. Hartford South, LLC
as 6:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Humphries and Roman Felix
Defendant:
Hartford South, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HARRIS v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
as 4:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
RICKY HARRIS
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, MARK RAY and JOSHUA HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Connor v. Suwannee Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2015cv00394
Plaintiff:
Nyka O'Connor
Defendant:
Suwannee Correctional Institution, Chris Landrum, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWSOME v. CLEMMONS et al
as 4:2014cv00612
Defendant:
M CLEMMONS, J E SPEIGHTS, PARKER and others
Plaintiff:
AARON EUGENE NEWSOME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsome v. Speights et al
as 6:2014cv01804
Plaintiff:
Aaron Eugene Newsome
Defendant:
J.E. Speights, M. Clemmons, Officer Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphries v. Shrn United, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv01657
Plaintiff:
Matthew Humphries
Defendant:
Shrn United, Inc. and Hitesh Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Humphries et al v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv22754
Plaintiff:
Craig Humphries and Gayleen Humphries
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation , Out Land Charters NV and XYZ Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
