Cases 61 - 70 of 93
Foudy et al v. Fort Pierce et al
as 2:2014cv14324
Plaintiff:
Shaun Foudy and Toni Foudy
Defendant:
City of Fort Pierce, Jason Braun and Jane and John Does (1-10)
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Foudy et al v. City of Sewall's Point et al
as 2:2014cv14325
Plaintiff:
Shaun Foudy and Toni Foudy
Defendant:
City of Sewall's Point, Mark L. Pennachio and Jane and John Does (1-10)
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Frederick v. City of Rockmart Georgia et al
as 4:2014cv00177
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Frederick
Defendant:
City of Rockmart Georgia, Steve Miller, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Askar et al
as 2:2014cv00291
Plaintiff:
Brian William Wallace
Defendant:
Kousay Sam Askar, Evans Energy Partners, LLC and Jane and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace v. Askar et al
as 8:2014cv01067
Plaintiff:
Brian William Wallace
Defendant:
Kousay Sam Askar, Evans Energy Partners, LLC and Jane and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace v. Askar et al
as 2:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Brian William Wallace
Defendant:
Kousay Sam Askar, The Seminole Tribe of Florida, Evans Energy Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv22252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv21352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Strickland v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2013cv00435
Plaintiff:
Alfreda Strickland
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon , Jane and John Doe(s) and Bank of America Home Loans
Wattleton v. Jane or John Doe et al
as 1:2012cv04193
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe, Institutional Trust Fund Administrator, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
