Cases 61 - 70 of 119
Gatson v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01231
Plaintiff:
Tokyo Gatson
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01236
Plaintiff:
Pete Hanks
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mikell v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01234
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mikell
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatson et al v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01036
Plaintiff:
Tokyo Gatson, Belinda Allen, Daniel Gatson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00403
Plaintiff:
Valerie Marie Moore
Defendant:
Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc., John Does 1-100 and Any other unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv21078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WEISSMAN, et al v. WILLIAMS, et al
as 1:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
MARK D WEISSMAN and WEATHERLY AVIATION COMPANY INC
Defendant:
FRANKLIN WILLIAMS , SOUTHER FIELD AVIATION INC , GEORGE CHEOKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond v. Arzola et al
as 1:2015cv20364
Plaintiff:
Kernst Saige Raymond, El
Defendant:
Antionio Arzola, Jane Doe 1-100, John Does 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickenbottom et al v. Stone et al
as 0:2015cv60153
Plaintiff:
Donna Hickenbottom and Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Barry Joel Stone, John Does 1-100, Jane Doe 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickenbottom et al v. Rosenthal et al
as 0:2015cv60115
Plaintiff:
Donna Hickenbottom and Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Lynn Rosenthal, John Does 1-100, Jane Doe 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
