Cases 61 - 70 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Newitt v. Adams et al
as 1:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Newitt
Defendant:
Timothy S. Adams, TS Adams Studio Architects, Inc., Alec G. Michaelides and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paul v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 1:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Rudy Pierre Paul
Defendant:
Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 5:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jackson
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America , Joseph McKerrocher, Pierre Fontaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCandliss et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03275
Plaintiff:
Scott McCandliss , Dmidriy Abramyan , Abdikadir Ahmed and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Uber Technologies (GA), Inc., Rasier LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Stability Engineering LLC et al
as 1:2014cv02131
Plaintiff:
Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina
Defendant:
Stability Engineering LLC, Pierre Denis Coiron and The Overlook Unit Owners Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cannon v. USA
as 4:2014cv00025
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Pierre J. Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
