Cases 61 - 70 of 322
Ford v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv02367
Plaintiff:
Berry Lee Ford
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv02368
Plaintiff:
John Douglas White
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowrance v. Bentley et al
as 2:2014cv02316
Plaintiff:
Roger Deon Lowrance
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Bentley et al
as 2:2014cv01045
Plaintiff:
Gary Davis Hart, II , Nathan D. Slaton , Kenneth Loggins and others
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson et al v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv01012
Plaintiff:
Cecil M. Ferguson and William W. Horsman, III
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Alabama Dept of Corrections , Dewayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Amerson et al
as 1:2014cv01862
Plaintiff:
Everett Leon Stout
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Brian McVeigh, Leon Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pippen v. Bentley et al
as 6:2014cv01787
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pippen
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Freddie Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01774
Plaintiff:
Jon Johnson
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beckwith v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00933
Plaintiff:
Keith Lamar Beckwith
Defendant:
State of Alabama , Kim Tobias Thomas , Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Bentley, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00782
Plaintiff:
John Lewis Harris
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
