Cases 61 - 70 of 123
Eric Watkins v. West Regional Library Employee, et al
as 15-13096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST REGIONAL LIBRARY EMPLOYEES, JIM FLYNN, MARRY CASSELL and others
Chinchon v. Kachkar et al
as 1:2015cv22515
Plaintiff:
Susy Chinchon
Defendant:
Jack Kachkar and Victoria Benkovitch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Charles McClain, Sr. v. Iradimed Corporation, et al
as 15-12779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E. MCCLAIN, SR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ROBERT RAFA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and CONRAD MATT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
IRADIMED CORPORATION, ROGER SUSI, CHRIS SCOTT and others
Walker v. Heard et al
as 7:2015cv00924
Plaintiff:
Susie Rosetta Walker
Defendant:
Ervin Heard and Bibb County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Artigas v. Diaz
as 0:2015cv60253
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Artigas
Defendant:
Gloria Susy Diaz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Eric Watkins v. West Regional Library Employee, et al
as 15-10458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST REGIONAL LIBRARY EMPLOYEES, JIM FLYNN, MARRY CASSELL and others
Aguilera v. Royal American Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv24635
Plaintiff:
Arianna Aguilera
Defendant:
Royal American Management, Inc., Susie Moretti, Odalys Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marsh v. Chapman
as 4:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
Susie Bell Marsh
Defendant:
Charles Randall Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lam v. Iradimed Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv23337
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lam
Defendant:
Iradimed Corporation, Roger Susi and Chris Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
