Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jovine v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 9:2011cv80111
Plaintiff:
Jason Jovine
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Spaulding v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02328
Plaintiff:
Ronald N. Spaulding, Ronald N. Spaulding and Ronald N. Spaulding
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
State of Alabama et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 2:2008mc03429
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama, State of Alabama, State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Movant:
Troy King, Troy King, Troy King and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hoyle v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 0:2007cv61847
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hoyle
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P., Purdue Fredrick Company, Purdue Pharma Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moody v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv01417
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Moody and Samuel J. Moody
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv60475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
