Cases 71 - 80 of 150
McKenzie-Wharton et al v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 8:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Lou Bertha McKenzie-Wharton and Richard G. Wharton
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barberi v. Bertha Wireless, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv61817
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Bertha Wireless, Inc. and Rodman Powerline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Aguliar v. Army Reserve Unit 663rd En Co
as 5:2014cv00701
Plaintiff:
Bertha Marie Aguliar
Defendant:
Army Reserve Unit 663rd En Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Butler v. First Franklin Loan Trust 2006-FF17 et al
as 3:2014cv00440
Plaintiff:
Bertha Lee Butler
Defendant:
First Franklin Loan Trust 2006-FF17, Structured Asset Securities Corporation, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Russo et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2014cv80049
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner:
Dino Russo , Vonsheila Hatcher , Deni Michelle Ackeridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Wrubleski v. Blay et al
as 0:2013cv62403
Plaintiff:
Paul F. Wrubleski
Defendant:
Debra Blay , Robert Calabrese , Sabrina Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRUMBLEY v. COLVIN
as 5:2013cv00291
Plaintiff:
BERTHA L CRUMBLEY
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RAMIREZ v. MATHEW'S CLOTHES AND SHOES, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv21344
Defendant:
SAUL RAMIREZ , MATHEW'S CLOTHES AND SHOES, INC. and ANA BERTHA HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Moton v. National Motor Club of America, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Bertha M. Moton
Defendant:
National Motor Club of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
