Cases 71 - 80 of 105
DIVINE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03135
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK RUFO, NATHANIEL RENTZ, DAVID CUNNINGHAM and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HENRY et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03078
Plaintiff:
WESLEY BRAND, HADRIAN CLEAGUE, VICTOR VOLYNETS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HICKS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03082
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HAHN, AMORRIS CONLEY, JONATHAN STARK and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00836
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burger King Corporation v. Rackson Restaurants, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv25447
Defendant:
Rackson Holdings, LLC, Rackson King Conn, LLC, Capital Circle Summit II, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
URBAN et al v. CERTIFIED ROOFING SOLUTIONS LLC
as 5:2018cv00276
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, ASHLEY GARZA, LOGAN LITTRELL and others
Defendant:
CERTIFIED ROOFING SOLUTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Poole v. Tire Recycling Services of Florida, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00810
Defendant:
Tire Recycling Services of Florida, Inc. and Christopher Johnson
Plaintiff:
Shane Poole
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Johnson v. City of Miami Beach et al
as 1:2018cv23925
Defendant:
Christopher Aguila, Roger Gaitan, Eugenio Abay and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Masony et al
as 2:2018cv00457
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Kimberly Roberts, Marie Nembhard and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Poole, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Transworld Systems, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00716
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Transworld Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
