Cases 71 - 80 of 536
Ronald Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution, et al
as 20-10042
Defendant / Appellee:
HORUS MUSIC VIDEO DISTRIBUTION, TIDAL, PAYPAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00702
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00699
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Ferguson Jr v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2019cv05644
Plaintiff:
Richard L Ferguson Jr
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Boothe v. WM specialty Mortgage Specialty LLC et al
as 0:2019cv62685
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Does 1-100, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Boothe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution et al
as 8:2019cv02531
Defendant:
Chase Bank, Tidal, PayPal and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Furr v. PNC Bank, N.A., et al
as 19-14215
Defendant / Appellee:
TD BANK, N.A., JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. and PNC BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT C. FURR
Overton et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv01675
Plaintiff:
Michaelle C Overton and Mica Shane Overton
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Synovus Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosemary Anderman, et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National, et al
as 19-13734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSEMARY ARBUCKLE ANDERMAN, MARILYN ARBUCKLE SCHEIDT and CAROLYN ARBUCKLE PLATT
Defendant / Appellee:
PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES, PLLC and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04040
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
