Cases 71 - 80 of 221
FITZGERALD v. CHILD SUPPORT RECEIVER et al
as 5:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
DEWYAN RENARD FITZGERALD and SHARRIEF BEY
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE, SPENCER, CHILD SUPPORT RECEIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wright v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
Leroy C Wright
Defendant:
Nurse Joy, Ms. Bailey, Ms. Crosser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. CARRICK et al
as 5:2021cv00048
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MICHELLE WESTBROOK, JOHN OR JANE DOE, MAJOR DAVID CARRICK and others
Plaintiff:
CORDERA DANTEZE SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Ms. [FNU] Mosely, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Mr. [FNU] Whitfield and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. John and Jane Doe
as 1:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lewis
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. John and Jane Doe
as 5:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Defendant:
NURSE MILLER, Nurse JOHN OR JANE DOE, PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION et al
as 5:2020cv00402
Defendant:
H&CS Services, LLC d/b/a Community Ambulance, John and Janes Does, Zoll Medical Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Johnson and Carol Johnson, as administrator of the Estate and Surviving Spouse of Edward Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00232
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc. and John and Jane Does #1-10
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03799
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
