Cases 71 - 80 of 106
Macleod v. Scott et al
as 3:2014cv00806
Plaintiff:
Robert Craig Macleod
Defendant:
Rick Scott and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macleod v. Scott et al
as 3:2014cv00792
Plaintiff:
Robert Craig Macleod
Defendant:
Rick Scott and Attorney General Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macleod v. Scott et al
as 3:2014cv00793
Plaintiff:
Robert Craig Macleod
Defendant:
Rick Scott and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAEE et al v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2014cv00319
Plaintiff:
JAY ZAEE and JIMMY ZAEE
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and PAM BONDI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ndegwa v. Holder et al
as 3:2014cv00293
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ndegwa
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr. and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacon v. Bondi et al
as 2:2013cv00804
Petitioner:
Robert Bacon
Respondent:
Pam Bondi and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heard v. Martin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2013cv14364
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Heard
Defendant:
Martin County Sheriff's Office, Brevard County Sheriff's Office, Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GOODYEAR v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2013cv00440
Plaintiff:
GREGORY S GOODYEAR
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, FLORIDA BAR, JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Kahane v. State of Florida, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv14233
Plaintiff:
Michael Kahane
Defendant:
State of Florida, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montanez v. Bondi et al
as 0:2013cv61184
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Montanez
Defendant:
Pam Bondi and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
