Cases 71 - 80 of 1,146
South v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Kayla South
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Kari Pearce, Christopher Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04686
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TAYLOR, MARIO DEBARROS, ALPHADEL MCKEE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16464
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHAW, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Critter & Pest Defense Limited Liability Company et al
as 6:2023cv00969
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Critter & Pest Defense Limited Liability Company, Carl Shaw and Stephanie Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15908
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08916
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roy Day v. GEICO General Insurance Company, et al
as 23-11935
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY A. DAY
Defendant / Appellee:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DONALD J. TRUMP, WILLIAM BARR and others
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14422
Plaintiff:
CODY SHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14130
Plaintiff:
JUSTYN SHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joseph Gilberti, Jr. v. President of the United States, et al
as 22-13541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH DENNIS GILBERTI, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, DONALD J. TRUMP, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
